![]() ![]() Thanks and sorry to those who actually did read my shitty rant. TL:DR Norsca is worse than Beastmen, and they should have rework priority. ![]() I can't even begin to imagine the truckloads of shit the game shovels in your face on VH/L. I can't be the only one that feels that Norsca is worse by far. How is any of this better than Beastmen? I feel like people who talk about how bad Beastmen are never actually tried Norsca in ME. Meanwhile you have no freedom of the hordes, while being (usually) the single enemy of the ordertide. Crappy economy, indefensible territory, inability to properly expand, constant whack-a-mole. They have the worst aspects of both conquest and horde factions without the benefit of either. Why? Just why? You lost a few units in a tough battle, or you want to update your army? Go back north, dumbass! Supposedly capturing capitals reduces it, but good luck actually holding on to those. Want some money from razing? Nope, waste the turn sacking the town first.Inability to take the replenishment option after battle.The ones that flat out take your money, in addition to debuffs are super common as well. You think Beastmen dark moon mechanic is bad? How about being constantly bombarded with penalty and debuff events that last 10 turns, sometimes you even get them several turns in a row.It's not like it'll get recaptured the moment you move your army. Hope you like burning that money you don't have. Outpost buildings aside from the main one don't convert, you have to build them from scratch. You just captured a level 5 capital? Too bad.Inability to capture land settlements aside from capitals. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |